Publishing an encyclopedia entry is not the end of the process. A reliable workflow first tests materiality and public evidence, then decides whether to update, wait or correct only the company fact page. Check current platform rules before editing.
Create a change-trigger register
Review legal names, brand relationships, key people, significant transactions, core scope and official websites monthly. A change becomes a candidate only when effective and encyclopaedically relevant.
Prepare evidence for every edit
Break proposed text into atomic claims and record old text, new text, reason, source, date, independence and supporting passage. Do not infer conclusions the source does not state.
Control tone, scope and versions
- Edit only what evidence supports
- Remove promotional adjectives and retain necessary context
- Disclose conflicts and follow platform review processes
- Keep before-and-after text, evidence, outcome and feedback
- Review broken links, image rights and disputes quarterly
Set priorities and stop conditions
High-priority changes include effective legal names, material transactions, key people and core business facts supported by reliable sources. Slogans, short campaigns and release-only claims are lower priority. Pause when evidence conflicts, facts are not effective or conflicts of interest require discussion.
Maintain a ledger and quarterly review
- Trigger date, requester and reason
- Old text, proposed text and supporting source
- Platform, editing path and affiliation disclosure
- Submission, review, rollback and result
- Next review and link health
How often should an encyclopedia entry be updated?
Do not edit for activity. Use factual changes, new reliable evidence, corrections or broken sources as triggers, with scheduled read-only review.
Can a company directly maintain its Wikipedia article?
Affiliated editors should follow conflict-of-interest guidance, disclose relationships and use cautious edit-request processes. The article is not company-controlled property.
Which changes should wait?
Future plans, release-only promotional claims, rankings without independent evidence and privacy-sensitive personal information should wait.
Source：Wikipedia: Reliable sources